Egypt’s Evolving Role in Africa: A Sub-Saharan Perspective.

Issaka K.
 

Introduction
Talking about the role of a country in a specific region means, to a large extent, talking
about its foreign policy vis-à-vis that region. One could therefore write the title of this
presentation as “Egypt’s foreign policy towards Africa” or “Egypt’s African Policy”, and
all these formulations will more or less mean that same thing. As it is clear from the title,
this presentation will deal specifically with the role of Egypt in Sub-Saharan Africa
through the lenses of a Sub-Saharan observer and analyst. However, given that there are
many factors that a country must take into account in formulating its foreign policy
choices, I will start by analysing the main factors that inform Egypt’s foreign policy
actions vis-à-vis Africa.
 

Egyptian foreign policy-making: important factors and constraints
The foreign policy of a country is largely defined by a number of considerations or
factors. Prominent among those are a) its geographic location; b) its historical and sociocultural
heritage and links; c) its national interests; and d) its financial and political clout.
The ideology – religious or political – that the leaders of a country espouse may also have
a significant impact on its foreign policy orientation at one point or another. It is in the
context of these four or five factors that one may analyse Egypt’s role in Africa and its
policies vis-à-vis the continent.
 

Geographically, Egypt is located at the crossroads between the Middle East, the
Mediterranean and Sub-Saharan Africa. This description implies also that Egypt is
located in Africa, and it is therefore an African country. Sub-Saharan Africa is
understood here to be all of Africa apart from the six countries of what is geopolitically
known as North or Arab Africa, that is Egypt itself, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria,
and Mauritania. Sudan is the only majority Arabic-speaking country in Africa that is
Egypt’s Evolving Role in Africa Issaka K. SOUARE 2
considered in almost all geopolitical maps as being part of Sub-Saharan Africa and not
North Africa. As it is obvious in the map of Africa, apart from bordering the Middle East,
Egypt is not the only country with these geographical characteristics, but it is Egypt that
is the subject of this presentation.
 

With regard to its historical and socio-cultural heritage and links, Egypt is largely an
Arab-Islamic state. Although Egypt, as the rest of Africa, was only arabised and/or
islamicised, both Arabism and Islam have come to be rooted in Egyptian history and
social-cultural fabric and imaginary. So much so that taking Egypt from any of these two
entities today will mean an amputated Islamic or Arab world. The Cairo-based Al-Azhar
University is arguably the oldest (more than a thousand years) and the most prestigious
centre of Islamic scholarship in the world. And if one were to take away the Egyptian
contribution to contemporary Arabic language and literature you would surely leave that
language a lame man.
 

In fact, the starting point of contemporary Arabic literature is almost unanimously put at
the arrival of Napoleon’s French forces in Egypt in 1798 and the developments that
ensued that interaction between European and Arab cultures. There would be no
contemporary Arabic literature without the contributions of Egyptian authors such as
Ahmed Shawqi, Taha Hussein, Al-Aqqad, Al-Mazeni, Abdurahman Shukri, Najib
Mahfouz and many others.
 

In the Philosophy of the Revolution, Gamal Abdel Nasser, the architect of the July 1952
revolution in Egypt, tried to theorise Egypt’s foreign policy on the basis of the three
policy centres that one can easily surmise from the above-mentioned two factors. He
identified these centres as the three circles of Egyptian foreign policy, namely the Arab,
the Islamic and the African circles. He therefore did not find any contradiction in Egypt
belonging to and playing a leading role in the Arab League (with its headquarters in
Cairo), the Organisation of African Unity and the Organisation of Islamic Conference.
Just as to what extent Egypt accords more importance to one or the other of these three
circles is a matter that changes according to times and circumstances. From a Sub-
Saharan perspective, however, and without this being a criticism per se, it would seem
that the Arab circle is predominant if not more important to Egypt than the African one,
not least by the official name of the country – the Arab Republic of Egypt.
 

It is these two factors that largely inform Egypt’s national interest, which is the third
factor that defines a country’s foreign policy. From its geographical location bordering
the Middle East, and its social-historical (Arab-Islamic) links to the countries of this
region, events that happen in this part of the world are susceptible to impact either
positively or negatively on Egypt’s national security and economic prosperity. No event
is more illustrative of this than the Israeli-Arab conflict. This conflict has, on at least four
occasions (1948; 1956; 1967 and 1973), drawn Egypt to open war with Israel. Political
stability in this region is therefore of great concern for Egyptian national security and
thus national interest. Also, given its limited natural resources and the abundance of these
Egypt’s Evolving Role in Africa Issaka K. SOUARE 3
resources in a number of countries of this region, it is in Egypt’s national interest to
maintain good relations with Gulf Arab countries.
 

From its location north of the Nile Basin and its dependence on the Nile River for its very
existence, ensuring the continuous flow of the Nile waters from countries of its origin,
namely Uganda, Sudan and Ethiopia, is one of key national interest concerns for Egypt.
And of course, maintaining its friendly relationship with the United Sates, the world’s
only superpower, and the generous financial assistance that the latter provides it with
(estimated at more than $50 bn since 1978) is another key foreign policy objective that
Egypt considers part of its national interest.
 

Finally, and here I’m talking about the fourth factor that defines a country’s foreign
policy, one must not forget that Egypt is a Third World African state with limited
economic resources at its disposal (but relatively prosperous within Africa), and that is
politically rivalled by other actors on all of its geographical borders. The financial and
political weight that a country carries may constitute an advantage or a constraint on that
country’s foreign policy choices and actions. Egypt’s financial and political status
constitutes both.
 

With regard to this status constituting a constraint on Egypt’s foreign policy actions in
Africa, it is worth noting that countries such as Nigeria, Libya and now South Africa rival
Egypt and spearhead initiatives that Egypt could do in order to have a more noticeable
Africa-focused foreign policy. Also, other North African states tend to exclude Egypt
from the club of Maghrib countries, considering it more Machreq or Middle Eastoriented
than Maghrib. This is rather evidenced by Egypt’s exclusion from the Union of
Maghrib Arab (UMA) countries. This is largely informed by the fear of these countries of
Egyptian domination. Another reason of this situation may also be the fact that, with the
exception of Libya, they were all under French domination and still maintain close ties
with Paris, which is not the case for Egypt. Yet in the Arab Machreq, Egypt is considered
as African and countries such as Saudi Arabia would want to preserve the leadership role
in that region.
 

But despite all these constraints, perhaps because of them, Egypt has been forced to
devise creative strategies to ascertain its three circles policy and it has not been
unsuccessful in that. These strategies have sought to transform some of these constraints
into advantages, hence my assertion that Egypt’s financial and political status constitutes
both a constraint and an advantage in its foreign policy. It is now to the African chapter
of these three circles that I now turn, bearing in mind what I have said above.
 

Egypt’s strategic role in Africa
To measure a country’s role in another country or a set of countries, one needs to take
into account the contribution that the acting country makes to what the partner country or
countries consider as important issues to them. And here one can identify a number of
issues of particular importance to Africa and analyse the role played by Egypt on these
issues. Given that the whole of Africa (save Ethiopia and Liberia) were colonised by
Egypt’s Evolving Role in Africa Issaka K. SOUARE 4
European powers and that Egypt regained its independence before any other African
country, the first issue to measure Egypt’s role in Africa will therefore be African
decolonisation. With decolonisation comes the need to safeguard one’s newly regained
sovereignty. What role did Egypt play in this in Africa? Then comes an array of
partnership issues, such as economic development, education and conflict resolution and
conflict management (peacekeeping), just to mention a few of these key issues.
African decolonisation
 

The Cold War logic that prevailed in at least the first few years of their country’s
independence meant that fighting colonialism and/or neo-colonialism was a paramount
concern for the revolutionary regime that was at the helm of Egyptian affairs under the
leadership of Gamal Abdel Nasser at this time. From this common vision drawn from a
common cause, Egypt was a close ally of almost all African countries in their struggle to
regain their independence. As some countries regained their sovereignty and had a
similar vision for African liberation, Egypt worked hand in hand with these countries,
such as Kwame Nkruma’s Ghana and Sekou Touré’s Guinea, to achieve African
independence. Egypt extended its helping hand to liberation movements across the
continent through both direct financial assistance, military training and political and
diplomatic advocacy for their cause at all international forums.
 

In my book on Africa in the United Nations System, I note that the first African country to
sit on the Security Council of the UN was Egypt from January 1946 to December 1947.
Without being interrupted by another African state, Egypt sat again on the Council from
January 1949 to December 1950. It took almost ten years after this before another
African country was admitted to the Council. That was Tunisia from January 1959 to
December 1960. The first time when two African states met in the Council was when
Egypt again (but then merged with Syria as the United Arab Republic) and Liberia were
non-permanent members of the Council from January 1961 to December of the same
year. While Liberia served only one year that time round, Egypt continued to December
1962. Making use of this position at the United Nations, Egypt added its voice to other
independent African states to advance the cause of African liberation on the world stage.
In fact, the first resolution of the United Nations specifically aimed at the Apartheid
system in South Africa was adopted in September 1952 and was sponsored by Egypt and
12 Asian countries. This resolution was a reaction to the oppressive response of the
Apartheid regime to the non-violent “Campaign for the Defiance of Unjust Laws” that
the ANC and the South African Indian Congress (SAIC), together with organisations
representing the Coloured people as well as some white opponents of the system of
Apartheid had launched on 26 June 1952. Egypt and these other countries had requested
the insertion in the agenda of the 7th session of the UN General Assembly held in
September 1952 an item entitled: “The question of race conflict in South Africa resulting
from the policies of apartheid of the Government of the Union of South Africa.”
In his autobiography, Where Others Wavered, former Namibian President, Sam Nujoma
recalls: “When in 1963, the first group [of Namibian freedom fighters] went for military
Egypt’s Evolving Role in Africa Issaka K. SOUARE 5
training in Cairo, this was possible because President Gamal Abd el-Nasser of Egypt had
offered me training and tickets”. Nujoma concludes by noting: “Nasser was a dedicated
supporter of African liberation.”
 

African development through African organisations
The Organisation of African Unity (OAU) was created in 1963 to help non-independent
African countries to liberate themselves from the yoke of European colonialism and to
coordinate the efforts of independent ones to preserve their sovereignty and achieve
economic sustainability and prosperity. Egypt played a pivotal role in the formation of
the OAU and in its sustenance over the years. In the early 1980s, Egypt established the
Egyptian Fund for Technical Cooperation with Africa. This fund has since been offering
Egyptian experts and consultants in different fields to various African countries. Egyptian
universities also attract a significant number of African students. And today, Egypt is one
of the five African states that contribute 75 per cent (15 per cent each) of the annual
budget of the African Union that replaced the OAU in 2002. The other four countries are
Algeria, Libya, Nigeria and South Africa.
 

In 1998, Egypt joined the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA),
and three years later, in 2001, joined the Sahel and Sahara Union (SEN-SAD), two key
region economic organisations that seek to advance inter-African economic integration.
Egypt is also a founding member of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development
(NEPAD), in which it is in charge of the agricultural file.
These few examples are an indication of the scope of the cooperation between Egypt and
the rest of Africa.
 

Egypt and conflict management in Africa
For various reasons, armed conflicts have come to be one of the main threats faced by
many post-colonial African countries. The role that various partners of these African
countries play in preventing and solving these conflicts is therefore important. Egypt has
played a very positive and constructive role in this regard. First, unlike some countries,
both in North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa and beyond, Egypt has not been involved in
destabilising other African countries either by a direct attack or a proxy war. Second,
Egyptian authorities have sent peacekeeping troops to a good many African conflict
zones, especially under UN flag. It was also at the 1993 OAU summit, held in Cairo, that
the establishment of an African Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management and
Resolution was announced.
 

Conclusion and policy recommendations
Understanding the dynamics, the constraints and the different factors that Egypt must
take into account in formulating its foreign policy choices and actions, it is fair to argue
that Egypt does play an important role in Africa, not least its financial contribution to the
Egypt’s Evolving Role in Africa Issaka K. SOUARE 6
AU. This notwithstanding, there is a wide perception in Sub-Saharan Africa that albeit
Egypt may be making more financial contribution to African issues today, the symbolism
that its active and, to some, militant involvement in African affairs under Gamal Abdel
Nasser has decreased if not disappeared. Egyptian delegations at meetings of the Arab
League have, in recent years, tended to be more important in their composition than what
are usually seen at OAU/AU summits.
 

For a considerable length of time, appearances of President Hosni Mubarak have been
rare at OAU/AU summits. Compared to other North African countries, such as Qaddafi’s
Libya and Bouteflika’s Algeria, one observes that these countries have striven to be
present at almost all OAU/AU summits. Of course Egypt fares better in this comparison
than other countries such as Tunisia, but we are talking about Egypt’s current role in
comparison with its previous one. It is understandable that the Egyptian authorities be
mindful of security concerns, especially since the attempted attack on the life of President
Mubarak in Ethiopia in 1995. But one must accept that this could have happened to him
anywhere in the world.
 

The technical cooperation between Egypt and many African countries is a laudable
initiative and this should be maintained at its current level if not strengthened.
In peacekeeping in Africa, while it is true that Egypt tries to be present in almost all UN
peacekeeping missions in the continent, there surely is a need for Cairo to consider
increasing the number of its contingents according to the size of its military capacity.
While all contributions are appreciated regardless of their size, Egypt should consider
doing more than mere symbolic (by sending like 10 to 30 personnel) contributions in
many instances. And here I appeal to the Egyptian authorities to consider a serious
contribution to the AU operation in Somalia. Egypt can also play a leading role in the
political settlement of the conflict in that country.
 

Another conflict situation where Egypt could consider playing a leading role is the issue
of Western Sahara. From my personal interactions with diplomats of the Polisario Front,
Morocco and Algeria, and from my knowledge of the complexity of the situation, I know
this is not an easy terrain to ride on. But this does not mean that one cannot try. Indeed,
given Egypt’s neutral stance on this conflict and the good relations it seems to have with
all concerned, I think it stands a good chance of bringing the parties closer to a mutually
acceptable solution, should it use the right approach.
 

And finally, the conflict in the Sudanese region of Darfur constitutes both a challenge and
an opportunity for countries such as Egypt to play a leading role in. Some have wrongly
described this conflict as a conflict between Arab-Muslims and African Christians. All
the parties are clearly Muslim. But while I say this, one cannot deny the fact that
Darfurians, notwithstanding their Islamism, are largely non-Arab speaking and that those
that are at the helm of power in Khartoum are mainly Arabs or Arab speaking. It is
therefore true that the conflict is between Arabs and non-Arabs. There is a difference
between “facts” and “perceptions”, but perceptions do matter. With the perception that
the conflict in Darfur is between Arabs and Africans and the other perception if not the
Egypt’s Evolving Role in Africa Issaka K. SOUARE 7
 

fact that Egyptians consider themselves more Arabs than Africans, an effective resolution
of the Darfurian quandary may be very defining in Arab-African relations. Should Egypt
succeed in using its influence over the regime in Khartoum to put an end to the human
tragedy in Darfur, this will go a long way into affirming Egypt’s strategic role in the
African continent.
References
Nkrumah, Gamal, “The Golden Age of Arab-African Relations”, African Renaissance,
vol. 1, no. 1, June/July 2004, pp. 15-26.
Said, Mohamed Kadry, “Egypt’s Foreign Policy in Global Change: The Egyptian Role in
Regional and International Politics,” Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic
Studies, 5 December 2006.
Sharawy, Helmy, “Arab-African Relations: From Liberation to Globalisation,” African
Renaissance, vol. 1, no. 1, June/July 2004, pp. 43-54.
Souaré, Issaka K., Africa in the United Nations System, 1945-2005 (London, Adonis &
Abbey, 2006), chaps. 1 & 2.
Souaré, Issaka K., “African Membership in the Arab League, Commonwealth, la
Francophonie and CPLP: Implications of Divided Allegiance for Regional
Integration in Africa”, African Renaissance, vol. 2, no. 1, January/February 2005,
pp. 65 – 73.
United Nations, United Nations and Apartheid: 1948-1994 (New York: United Nations
Publications, 1994), pp. 10-11, para. 32.